Google Scholar – an unlimited database of state and federal case law, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
The main objectives of police would be to apprehend offenders, examine crimes, and prosecute them before the cours also to prevent to commission of crime, and earlier mentioned all assure legislation and order to protect citizen???s life and property. Read more
Because the Supreme Court would be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has actually been attained, therefore the decision from the Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) on the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that could be consulted in deciding a current case. It may be used to guide the court, but is not really binding precedent.
This is because transfer orders are typically considered within the administrative discretion in the employer. However, there can be exceptions in cases where the transfer is motivated by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, they may have grounds to challenge before the appropriate forum. Read more
As being the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been reached, therefore the decision on the Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) of your Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
PLR can be a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :
eleven . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is really a free and democratic region, and once a person becomes a major they can marry whosoever he/she likes; In case the parents of your boy or Woman tend not to approve of these inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they might do if they could Minimize off social relations with the son or the daughter, However they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these kinds of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Lady that is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or guy who is a major, the couple is neither harassed by anybody nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who gives these kinds of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence both himself or at his instigation, is taken to process by instituting criminal proceedings because of the police against these persons and further stern action is taken against these person(s) as provided by law.
The DCFS social worker in charge of your boy’s case experienced the boy made a ward of DCFS, As well as in her 6-thirty day period report towards the court, the worker elaborated about the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to maneuver him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle established by a court, which other courts are obligated to abide by.
Under Article 199, the court possesses the authority to review government procedures for reasonableness if applicable in respondent university and to safeguard aggrieved parties' rights. For that reason, this petition is admissible based on established court precedents, along with the respondents' objections are overruled. Read more
The reason for this difference is that these civil legislation jurisdictions adhere to a tradition that the reader should have the capacity to deduce the logic from the decision as well as the statutes.[four]
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials acting within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case legislation previously rendered on similar cases.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to your main case, It is usually a well-set up proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court read more is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is issue to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings around the evidence.